Question:
Can one fulfill the obligation of visiting the sick through a phone call (txt
or email), or must it be done in person?
It
goes without saying that any act of reaching out to someone who is sick is an
act of chesed, but the issue here is the technical fulfillment of the mitzvah
of bikur cholim. Does that have to be done in person?
Answer:
The pasuk in Shemot (18:20) says,
וְהוֹדַעְתָּ֣ לָהֶ֗ם אֶת־הַדֶּ֙רֶךְ֙ יֵ֣לְכוּ בָ֔הּ
וְאֶת־הַֽמַּעֲשֶׂ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר יַעֲשֽׂוּן׃ - “and make known to them the
way they are to go and the practices they are to follow.” The Talmud in Bava Metzia
(30b) explains that “the way they are to go and practices to follow” refers to
visiting the sick, bikur cholim. Furthermore, the pasuk in Devarim
(13:5) says, אַחֲרֵ֨י ה' אֱלֹהֵיכֶ֛ם תֵּלֵ֖כוּ and the Talmud in Sotah (14b) says that clearly this pasuk
does not mean we can literally walk in the path of the shechinah, but rather,
it means that we should follow the midot of Hashem. The Talmud gives examples
of this: just as Hashem gives clothing to those who don’t have, so too, we
should do the same. Just as Hashem visits the sick, so to, we should. Just as
Hashem consoles the mourners, so to, we should. When making this point about
bikur cholim, the Talmud quotes the pasuk from Parashat Veyeira, וירא אליו ה׳ באלוני ממרא,
when Hashem visits Avraham after he had a brit mila.
Rav Ovadia says that when
mentioning bikur cholim, the Torah uses the language of וירא אליו, that
Hashem came to Avraham and we can add that one of the angels who came to visit
him also came in person. Presumably the idea of visiting the sick is to come
physically close to the person, to make sure he has everything he needs, medicine,
food, drink, etc. Rav Ovadia says that this mitzvah applies even if a person is
in the hospital and has doctors, nurses and family members attending to him, it
is still a mitzvah for you to come visit him and give him chizuk.
The Rambam writes that everyone
is obligated in this mitzvah of bikur cholim. Even an older person should go to
visit a child, even many times in one day and the more the better, up to a
certain point where it will be too much of a burden. And visiting the sick
removes “a piece” of the illness and makes it a little bit easier on the sick
person. Finally, someone who does not visit the sick is compared to one who is שופך דמים, commits murder.
Rav Ovadia adds that another
element to visiting the sick in person that allows you to see the predicament
the sick person is in and the severity of the illness and this will motivate
the visitor to pray with even more intensity for the healing of this individual.
This is based on the Talmud in Nedarim
(40a) says that “whoever visits the sick will pray and ask Hashem for mercy
that he should live. Conversely, whomever does not visit the sick will not pray
for their recovery. The Talmud in Shabbat (12b) also says that Hashem’s
shechinah rests above the head of a sick person. Presumably this is an
opportune time to pray and it seems clear that seeing the sick person will
arouse more of a desire to pray than if you just heard about his illness. In
fact, the Ramban says that if you visit the sick and don’t pray for him, you
have not fulfilled the mitzvah of bikur cholim.
So can you fulfill the
mitzvah with a phone call, txt or email?
Based on the above
analysis, Rav Ovadia says if you are able to go in person, you
must do so and if you do not, you have not fulfilled the mitzvah of bikur cholim.
Although it is true that you can pray for the sick from any location, praying
in the presence of the sick person is much more preferable. In fact, when
praying in the presence of the sick, you need not and according to some poskim,
should not mention his or her name. Leaving out the name is viewed as more
preferable. Clearly, accomplishing this in the most preferred way is not
possible by phone, txt or email. However, if you are not able to travel to
visit the person, calling him to give chizuk is still a great act of chesed. Although
Rav Ovadia did not discuss txting or emailing, I assume those would be less
desirable to calling as hearing one’s voice is more personal.
No comments:
Post a Comment